GRR for destructive test-Crimped terminal pull-out force

According to customer's requirement we need to perform GRR for conductor pull-out force (wire is being pulled out of crimped terminal using the force gage).
it is a destructive test: no chance to use the same sample for second time / split the sample and so on, in other words we can do only 1 test for each sample.
What can we use here? Nested GRR? If yes, is there a different calculation from crossed GRR? I have only standard AIAG form for crossed GRR. Could please someone share the form for nested GRR with me?

Or maybe we should apply another MSA study? What can you suggest?

Thank you.

 

It depends. You don't ALWAYS use a nested study. Also, while I have a lot of spreadsheets, I have not built a nested study one. I would fire up Minitab.

See link for proper deployment of crossed vs. nested.

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/michelle-paret/a-simple-guide-to-gage-randr-for-destructive-testing

Blah blah - some statement about how I don't work for Minitab.

 

Thanks, but I read this article just before posting here I don't have Minitab so I wonder if there is any difference between calculation formulas of crossed and nested GRR or it is just difference in obtaining samples method.
In other words can I use the same spreadsheet as for crossed GRR or do I need a new one special for nested GRR? And if I need new spreadsheet for nested GRR it would be very nice if someone send me an template

 

The concept is the same - you are checking variances between part/between operator/between trial and coming up with the conglomerate numbers. But the steps are different. Meaning, if you were to put results in Minitab, you'd get different answers running a crossed and a nested study on the SAME inputs. And I believe the nested numbers would be more conservative. I don't have ready access to it. You'd have to search around for the steps on Google.