Hi everybody In doing the risk analysis in 4.1 and 4.2, following 6.1, which says we have to identify Risk and opportunities in internal/external issues additionally in Interested parties. I have identified in context (Int/Ext issues) people, competitors and clients, but also have found the same in interested parties, but also have detected that in some cases the actions are the same for the treatment. People A In context, people, Risk= people left the company, poor competency B In interested parties, Risk= Do not comply people with requirements, law benefits, payments on time, etc. Treatment A, here I have to evaluate what to do, so that people dont leave the company. B. here, I have to take actions to cover the people´s needs. It seems they are different actions, Ok? Competitors In context, Risk= Lowering my sales In interested parties = requirements, Dont know what may apply Dont know what treatment to apply Clients C- In context, clients, Risk and opportunities= Risk for not delivering good products and opportunity to have more profits. D- In interested parties, clients, Risk = to not comply with good products and services, DOT,etc Treatment C = to apply actions to ensure good products to clients and actions to get more profits D =to apply actions to improve my DOT and to improve quality. I noticed Actions are the same. Questions 1- Do you think are ok my assumptions ? 2- Are there cases where the treatment is the same for the same aspect (e.g. clients) for context and interested parties? Please feed me back.