Hello guy. It is me, again. When reading the 8.2.2 and 8.2.3, I found another strange thing I can`t figure it out. In 8.2.2, there are two bullets: "a) the requirements for the products and services are defined, including: 1) any applicable statutory and regulatory requirements; 2) those considered necessary by the organization; b) the organization can meet the claims for the products and services it offers." In 8.2.3, there are four bullets: "a) requirements specified by the customer, including the requirements for delivery and post-delivery activities; b) requirements not stated by the customer, but necessary for the specified or intended use, when known; c) requirements specified by the organization; d) statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the products and services; e) contract or order requirements differing from those previously expressed." In 8.2.2, we determine the requirements for products and services and in 8.2.3, we review them. Put it in another way, the requirements for products and services are determined by 8.2.2, and reviewed by 8.2.3. Logically, the requirments for products and servcies should be the same things. However obviously, the content in these two subclauses don`t match with each other completely. Bullet a) in 8.2.2 has bullet c) and d) in 8.2.3 as the counterparts. But there is no relevant content in 8.2.2 corresponding to bullet a) and b) in 8.2.3. In fact, customer relevant requirements aren`t mentioned in 8.2.2 at all. Why? I can understand there may be no need to determine the requirements SPECIFIED by the customer. But What about the requirements in bullet b) of 8.2.3? Or maybe the requirements of a) 2) in 8.2.2 includes requirements in bullet b)? Looking forwards to your valuable insights on this matter.