1. Hello and Welcome to The Quality Forum Online...Continuing in the spirit of People Helping People !
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Management Reviews

Discussion in 'IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems' started by bkirch, Nov 30, 2018.

  1. bkirch

    bkirch Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    7
    We are a company that originally set up our Management Review meetings to occur on a quarterly basis, and they now occur on an annual basis. This annual meeting is the meeting which we make sure all of the ISO and IATF required inputs are covered and our Management Review evidence during audits.

    My issue with this meeting is that much of this same information is covered in other meetings throughout the year that we call Operations Review Meetings. So, by the time we get to the ISO/IATF Management Review meeting, the audience has seen much of the same information in other meetings. One exception is that our President attends the annual meeting and I don't believe he attends the Operations Review Meetings.

    My question, is would it be acceptable to get rid of our annual meeting where all required inputs are covered if I could show evidence that the required inputs are covered in various meetings through out the year?
     
  2. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    1,100
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Basically, yes. I've encountered this situation commonly. I'd suggest going back to quarterly, remembering that the purpose of management review is to review performance to goal compared to audit results/customer feedback etc. Don't fall into the trap of thinking it should be done monthly, because that's too much and you won't be looking at trend lines - which is the theme of MR.
     
  3. Golfman25

    Golfman25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2015
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    42
    Yes, we went from the annual management review, to "continuous" management review. Meaning, where the input/output comes up during our regular in the course of doing business meetings we hit it then. We keep a checklist to review to make sure we hit everything during the year.

    In your case, maybe providing an annual summary for the President to review might be helpful as well.
     
  4. John C. Abnet

    John C. Abnet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2017
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    27
    Good day @bkirch;
    As you have been counciled by others, YES indeed you can do that. Holding a singled "annual" management review can often be an overwhelming all-day rehash of what has already taken place throughout the course of the year.

    Additionally, in regards to an annual Management Review, what's the point? An annual review does not allow for results to be analyzed and action to be taken throughout the year. For those who choose to hold a single/comprehensive annual management review, it is essentially "too late" to respond to the inputs.

    Hope this helps.
    Be well.
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.
  5. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    1,100
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Great points, John! I liken MR to a budget review. Many organizations, having established their budget gather and track information on what's being spent in each "account". They don't wait until the end of the year to look in the cash box to see how much is/isn't left over...
     
    John C. Abnet likes this.
  6. ShaneChase

    ShaneChase New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I also agree with the opinion that management review meetings may be less then annually. We have set up a monthly meeting where each of the required issues are discussed, but not at each meeting. For example, Product conformance is covered each month but the maintenance objectives are covered every quarter. The thought is that this will minimize the meeting length, cover all needed items, and allow for some analysis of trends in data. It has worked very well so far and the IATF auditor really liked it so there should be no issue with compliance.
     
  7. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    1,100
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    which isn't any criterion in and of its own right...
     
  8. Serious Man

    Serious Man Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    7
    It was discussed in ISO9001:2015 forum.
    http://www.qualityforumonline.com/f...-acc-to-iso9001-2015-example.2026/#post-14167
    I put there my comments so maybe someone would find them valuable.

    Coming from that, I wouldn't combine monthly performance review meeting with management review.
    Short time perspective and "detail-focused" activities versus long term perspective and "general-organizational" actions.
    There are different inputs and different outputs in both cases.
     
  9. bkirch

    bkirch Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Another question that I had in regards to Management Review requirements is with 9.3.2 e) - the effectiveness of actions taken to address risks and opportunities. Could I get some input on the types of information that is used to meet this input requirement?
     
  10. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    1,100
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    So, let's say that as a result of a SWOT analysis, finding skilled workers is a risk to meeting customers' needs (interested parties and all that). Your organization decides to create an apprenticeship program. As this is implemented, it makes sense to review progress at the Management Review.
     
    bkirch likes this.
  11. bkirch

    bkirch Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Thank you Andy.
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.

Share This Page