Having interpretation issues... Seems the spec is requiring every dimension, flag note, etc. listed on the FAI form... but looks to give some options if the dwg requirement is satisfied on another work authorizing document and objectionable evidence is present with the 9102. Well.... have QE's wanting to list everything on the 9102... and I mean everything. I think it is a huge waste of time to duplicate entry’s if there is supporting evidence that supports the "flag note"... Why list the flag note and its acceptance on the 9102 if there is already documentation supporting its completion and acceptance? Why keep doing things twice... just adds to the cost of quality. What’s the opinion of this view.. and whether it should be listed.