Hello everyone! About a month ago, we had our surveillance audit and some minor NCs. I would like to hear your thoughts on two of those. The first one is against 7.2 Competence. During the audit, our colleagues were not able to present any evidence that a few identified interventions for competency needs were provided/implemented. However, the same auditor raised another NC against 9.1.3 citing that we had no evidence able to evaluate if the identified competency needs were addressed. This auditor was also citing the same samples from the first NC and a few more examples. To some extent, I am fine with the first one. We had lapses. We have to address it. Although, I feel like the second NC was simply a consequence of the first one. TL;DR: I don't think the NC against 9.1.3 is necessary (and is a bit redundant) because the fact that we did not meet the requirement for evaluating the effectiveness of actions taken was already pointed out in our NC against 7.2. P.S. Imagine responding to two separate Corrective Action Requests with basically the same thought.