1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Planning a supplier audit (tips and general advice)

Discussion in 'ISO 17025 - Calibration and Test Laboratories' started by andic, Aug 29, 2022.

  1. andic

    andic Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2020
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    7
    My facility makes Ni alloy bars for remelting and casting. In a couple of weeks will be going to visit a couple of suppliers which we have been using for subcontract analysis. Lab A is a big multinational we use for mechanical testing and chemistry over check when requested by customer or when we don't have the right approvals. Lab B is a smaller independent lab we use for trace element analysis of our product when we are busy and which we direct our raw materials (Ni, Cr, Ti etc...) suppliers to use for their CoC.

    Both labs have ISO 17025 and various other accreditations and approvals and they have never been audited by us before.
    I don't want to go in and start going though the standards clause by clause, I just think that it would be a waste of time since CBs and OEMs/primes will be doing that for their particular standards each year anyway.

    I think what would be helpful would be to
    1. check the documents and records relating to some of our historical jobs
    2. check their controls of subcontractors
    3. perhaps ask what CB NCRs they have had and see if we may have been impacted
    4. I am interested to know how they calibrate their equipment for very unusual elements (either as matrix or measurand)
    5. we do sometimes get mistakes on their certificates so I think I need to look at how they generate them

    I would like advice on how to approach that lot and also anything else I should consider for planning a worthwhile audit visit
     
  2. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,107
    Likes Received:
    2,562
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Why, in that case, are you deciding to do that now?
     
  3. andic

    andic Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2020
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    7
    A good question, there are a couple of factors:
    1. the volume of work we are sending has gone up quite significantly in the last few months and I have considered it a gap for a while
    2. we are working on an approval for an OEM and when we are audited by them I believe they will expect to see supplier audits for critical suppliers, these two labs are a critical part of the traceability chain as their results are used in our certification and Lab B is involved in the traceability of our raw materials
    3. plus points 4/5 above
    I also want to take a couple of my staff out to broaden their horizons and develop some experience of auditing
     
  4. Bev D

    Bev D Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    664
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Maine
    I think are on the right path here. I’ve never found a “ISO type audit” of a certified supplier to be anything more than an annoyance. You aren’t experts at the standard but you are expert at what you need your supplier to do for you. I always audited things like their technical ability and equipment - can it perform at the level you need? As you say - how do they prepare their certificates sinc e you’ve had difficulty. I’ve always looked at a supplier’s problem solving and corrective action ability. (I had a supplier who always seemed to blame their operators or blame us for any defects they shipped to us. A brief visit and we saw why - they had very few engineers and their management team was old fashioned’ shall we say. They lacked even the rudimentary knowledge of how to improve quality. Another supplier who had passed all kinds of ‘ISO’ Audis were found to have equipment that couldn't possibly manufacture our components. It took us 5 minutes to figure this out. And it is always good to have employees visit suppliers to expand their understanding of processes that effect you. You will also help establish a cooperative adn even collaborative relationship with good suppliers.

    So forget about the standard - evaluate the things that are important to you.
     
    yodon and RonR Quality Pro like this.
  5. RonR Quality Pro

    RonR Quality Pro Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2021
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    SW Ontario Canada
    Agree absolutely with Bev. Don't waste time auditing their QMS - focus on what makes them an important (critical) supplier to you, and what things have gone 'wrong' in the past that you would like them to improve on. Auditing should be a valuable activity, not just a check-mark in a box to satisfy someones list of requirements.
     
  6. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,107
    Likes Received:
    2,562
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Two great replies. To foster an effective supplier relationship, however, I'd get an agreement drafted that they will furnish (and you might have to pay for) a documented Service Quality Plan (or agreement) which defines how they will handle your requirements through their Lab QMS. This will provide for a basis to be audited for them and you.
     
  7. andic

    andic Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2020
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Thank you all for your replies
     
  8. andic

    andic Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2020
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Carried out the audits last week. Below is a summary of what we did and what we learned, in-case someone may find it interesting or helpful one day:

    I sat for a while and thought about what was most likely to go wrong with these suppliers or where we had issues before. Greatest risk was in the areas of contract review, getting the instructions into their lab, managing subcontract labs, generating the cert, sample prep, heat treatment and managing lead time. The areas could be split into contract review and subcontracting, Chem lab and Mech test. Handy because I was taking a quality engineer, a chemist and a metallurgist.

    I had a 1-2-1 meeting with each of the junior engineers who were coming along and we discussed their areas and where the risks were and came up with a couple of questions. I then sent them away and told them to come up with about 5 - 10 questions for their areas of responsibility. focused not on standards but on our needs.

    We got together in the afternoon and patched all the questions into one checklist, checked for duplication and for questions which were too specific or based too much on minor ASTM/ISO details.
    I also gave a brief along the lines of don't be too aggressive, and if you see something different to what you expect or what we do try to understand it and then decide if it's sufficient. There was a tendency to default to the questions they had themselves been asked in audits by CBs and internal auditors, particularly the chemist, we deleted most of that stuff

    The audit of Lab A went well, initially we lost track of time but managed to get focus back and review all areas as planned - Don't try to squeeze too much in
    It was apparent that a few corners had been cut with daily equipment checks, nothing serious. My assistant worked out what was going on very quickly but their chemist got a bit bolshie and defensive. - a bit of coaching to avoid rubbing people up the wrong way is required
    Lab B went more smoothly, the team were a little more confident and relaxed - practice/experience is important