1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Search Results

Search Again
Page 1 of 3
  1. johnnymo77
    Post

    Rules: 1.0 Eligibility - exclusion

    Didn't Honda or one of the other Asian OEMs "not require"?
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jun 15, 2020 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  2. johnnymo77
    Post

    Hi everyone, new quality employee here!

    Try EU Directive 2002/46/EC.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jun 15, 2020 in forum: New Member Introductions
  3. johnnymo77
    Post

    IATF 16949 Clause no. 8.5.6.1.1 Temporary Change of Process Controls

    I don't think so. They are to be approved back-up or alternate control methods. The 3rd paragraph of the clause says the alternate process...
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jun 15, 2020 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  4. johnnymo77
    Post

    What is it?

    I came across this term in my Lead Auditor training material from Exemplar. No definition, but I wrote in that the instructor said "this class".
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jul 25, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  5. johnnymo77
    Post

    IATF documentation - Annex A13F030A01

    It reminds me of a Ford requirement. If Ford is the customer, you might ask your STA.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jun 11, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  6. johnnymo77
    Post

    NC criteria

    I'm thinking 8.2.2.a.2 "those considered necessary by the organization" and/or 8.2.3.1.c "requirements specified by the organization".
    Post by: johnnymo77, Jun 11, 2019 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
  7. johnnymo77
    Post

    Pre-evaluation of statutory and regulatory requirements during audit planning

    Section 4.2 expects you to already have have already looked into these requirements. I would do audit planning to make sure I have the latest...
    Post by: johnnymo77, May 28, 2019 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
  8. johnnymo77
    Post

    Defective emergency light - NC against 8.5.1

    What have you been smoking? It's always been my responsibility to provide evidence to prove my company's innocence.
    Post by: johnnymo77, May 16, 2019 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
  9. johnnymo77
    Post

    Application of Clause 8.5.1 control Production and service Provision

    I don't see them as reiterations. I see section 8 as the culmination of sections 4, 5, 6 and 7. It's putting context, leadership, planning and...
    Post by: johnnymo77, May 16, 2019 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
  10. johnnymo77
    Post

    Repeated Major Nonconformances

    "Shall" looks ominous.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Apr 16, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  11. johnnymo77
    Post

    Audits/Checklist

    I picked up these somewhere along the way.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Apr 11, 2019 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
  12. johnnymo77
    Post

    Manufacturing process audits 9.2.2.3

    I agree.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Mar 5, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  13. johnnymo77
    Post

    Manufacturing process audits 9.2.2.3

    The Fiat-Chrysler CSR calls out LPAs for their MPA, in their section 9.2.2.3.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Mar 5, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  14. johnnymo77
    Post

    IATF 16949 - When to conduct SPC study ?

    Please see Ford CSR section 9.1.1 for ongoing SPC requirements. Basically you should be doing it in production continuously and performing at...
    Post by: johnnymo77, Mar 4, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  15. johnnymo77
    Post

    8.5.6.1 control of changes

    I think the answer is yes. In the paragraph that starts with the word "Changes" it says: (such as changes to part design, manufacturing location,...
    Post by: johnnymo77, May 30, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  16. johnnymo77
    Post

    Clause 4.4.1.2 Product safety

    I know very little about painting, so it's only my opinion... I can imagine a painted part getting hot and creating bad fumes. I think you...
    Post by: johnnymo77, May 30, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  17. johnnymo77
    Post

    Visual Inspection

    I don't think Inspectors should be passing nonconforming material. I like the idea of the Engineer signing off in a material review. I think your...
    Post by: johnnymo77, Apr 23, 2018 in forum: Sampling, Standards and Inspection
  18. johnnymo77
    Post

    IATF 16949 9.2.2.3 Manufacturing Process Audit

    Like Chrysler...
    Post by: johnnymo77, Feb 21, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
  19. johnnymo77
    Post

    PPAP for item(s) we do not manufacture.

    It's not that we get around it, its that we haven't been asked.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Feb 16, 2018 in forum: APQP and PPAP
  20. johnnymo77
    Post

    PPAP for item(s) we do not manufacture.

    Is this a new requirement? At my last company and my current company we don't PPAP or IMDS labels or ink.
    Post by: johnnymo77, Feb 15, 2018 in forum: APQP and PPAP
Showing results 1 to 20 of 51 Next >
Search Again
Page 1 of 3