1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Stakeholder survey

Discussion in 'IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems' started by Andy Nichols, Jul 8, 2019.

Tags:
  1. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes Received:
    2,557
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Andy Nichols, Jul 8, 2019
    #1
    tony s likes this.
  2. tony s

    tony s Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    1,055
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Laguna Philippines
    I asked in the survey how would IATF treat the statements with the word "should" in it (e.g. 7.5.3.2.2 Review should be completed within 10 working days of receipt of notification of engineering standards/specifications changes). What if an organization completed the review beyond 10 working days? The obsolete ISO/TS 16949:2009 has a guideline in the use of the words "shall" and "should".
     
    tony s, Jul 9, 2019
    #2