Hello to all I have been trying to set a method (easy, practical, fully understood by an auditor) to prove that we are monitoring and review 4,1 and 4.2 First option = In the MR meetings , example, in customer, is just to say " I have monitored and have not seen changes " that will be recorded in the MR records. Second option = In the MR meetings, to show a spreadsheet (like a checklist) and put a cross, on customer, to prove have monitored the customer and commenting out on it, "no changes". In here a checklist would be the record, also the MR meeting. In the first option , would be easier, but it is so vague and not precise when monitored and in second option, at least i think it is a like a more compromise. Dont know at what extent do we need to prove we have done this activity and also an important issue, is the involvement of each process owner. Thanks Ideas are welcomed.