1. Hello and Welcome to The Quality Forum Online...Continuing in the spirit of People Helping People !
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Lessons Learned - Is this a Requirement of ISO/TS 16949:2009?

Discussion in 'IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems' started by mlouc, Nov 25, 2015.

  1. mlouc

    mlouc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2015
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Location:
    Detroit
    I am loving this forum - thank you to everyone for sharing your knowledge and experience! Question: is the tool "lessons learned" an actual requirement in the ISO/TS 16949:2009 specification (I don't believe it is as I've read it numerous times cover to cover) or is it merely a widely recognized tool that can be used as evidence of an organization meeting the specification's requirement of improving the QMS? Thank you.
     
  2. Golfman25

    Golfman25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2015
    Messages:
    451
    Likes Received:
    139
    Trophy Points:
    42
    It's a tool, not a requirement. Good luck.
     
  3. MCW8888

    MCW8888 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2015
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    194
    Trophy Points:
    42
    A tool to show evidence of conformance to 8.5.3 Preventive Action.
     
  4. Ganesh Sundaresan

    Ganesh Sundaresan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    17
    The Phrase "Lesson Learned" as such does not find a place in ISO/TS Standard, at least to my knowledge.
    However, something that comes closer or even equivalent is 7.3.2.1 Product Design Input ;
    use of information: the organization shall have a process to deploy information gained from previous
    design projects, ********, supplier feedback, internal input, field data, and other relevant
    sources, for current and ******* of a similar nature;


    And also 7.3.2.2 Manufacturing Process Design Input :
    - experience from previous developments.
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.
  5. mlouc

    mlouc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2015
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Location:
    Detroit
    Thank you all. Should layered process audits, which are widely used in manufacturing in the U.S., be considered a tool as well which can serve as evidence for the organization satisfying 5.6.2a Review Inputs: Results of Audits? I would not categorize these as a requirement of the standard merely a tool but am looking for opinions on that. Thank you.
     
  6. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,016
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Not specifically, however, how will you update and improve things like your FMEA and Control Plans? Also LPAs are nothing more than an audit of what's being practiced at the time. Nothing about lessons learned.
     

Share This Page