1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Miner's Blogs Intro to MSA of Continuous Data – Part 6: R&R for Non-Replicable Measurements

Non-replicable R&R

  1. Miner

    Miner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Location:
    Greater Milwaukee USA
    Miner submitted a new resource:

    Intro to MSA of Continuous Data – Part 6: R&R for Non-Replicable Measurements - Non-replicable R&R

    Read more about this resource...
     
    Miner, Jan 20, 2016
    #1
  2. TheWaeller

    TheWaeller Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Hi Miner,

    it is good to have your experitse in this forum. You stated that a crossed analysis is not possible for destructive measurements.
    Is there a measure or guidannce which tells me that the parts are similar enough to carry out a crossed analysis?

    Waeller
     
    TheWaeller, Mar 23, 2016
    #2
  3. Miner

    Miner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Location:
    Greater Milwaukee USA
    There is no real guidance. If your judgement is that the parts are homogeneous, and if you cannot perform a nested study (i.e., no software or template), you can perform a crossed study. That is better than no study at all. However, the results WILL be different than you would get from a nested study. If the gage is clearly good or clearly bad, the difference will not affect your decision. If the gage is borderline, this difference could affect your decision.
     
    Miner, Mar 23, 2016
    #3