Need a little help. In the past when we have received non-conformances, the auditor identified the section of the standard clause by number and then made a statement of the "rule" and then described the evidence why he/she felt the "rule" was not met. Basically showing me the shall. Currently, I have an audit non-conformance and all that is indicated is the clause number. Then a statement about the process being "partially effective." This is followed by a description of the "evidence." I am having a hard time making heads or tails of it. Before I challenge, have audit report requirements changed? Should she be required to be more clear?