This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Search Results

Search Again

Page 1 of 4

Post
Standard Work Instruction Languages (IATF 16949 8.5.1.2)

Document language is not a problem. What about trainer, what about team leader questioned by one of foreigners during night shift over defected...

Post by: Serious Man, Mar 26, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
What is CAP-DO approach ? (Used before PDCA)

;) Tony, sometimes you look, but you don't see. Our 3rd party auditors still use it and I follow this approach during internal audits. Healthy...

Post by: Serious Man, Mar 22, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Manufacturing process audits 9.2.2.3

VDA 6.3 is example of audit method. OEMs find it adequate for purpose of manufacturing process audit. Questions in section 6 are all about...

Post by: Serious Man, Mar 5, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
What is CAP-DO approach ? (Used before PDCA)

This is auditing related question, so it should be asked in auditing sub-forum, dear leyladonmez, Ok? During CHECK stage monitoring/measurement...

Post by: Serious Man, Mar 1, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Management Reviews

Another third party auditor I met, asked about management reviews he has seen during audits told me, that generally organizations do not...

Post by: Serious Man, Jan 16, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Management Reviews

Dear judegu, it is for me rather review of management (methods) than review by management. It should be organizational shake up, so that's why it...

Post by: Serious Man, Jan 2, 2019 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Management Reviews

It was discussed in ISO9001:2015 forum....

Post by: Serious Man, Dec 3, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Going overboard on KPI's?

Managing (so called document control and management review are inside), human resources, quotation, product design, process design, purchasing,...

Post by: Serious Man, Nov 21, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Going overboard on KPI's?

IATF 16949 same as ISO/TS 16949 is management system standard. It is for managers or people involved in managing company. Of course our core...

Post by: Serious Man, Nov 20, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
6.2.1 c) The organization shall establish quality objectives

My understanding is quality objectives shall be equal or more strict than related requirements of interested parties. When customer says that...

Post by: Serious Man, Oct 3, 2018 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
Post
8.4.2.3 Supplier quality management system developement

Small comment - organization shall audit own external providers or there is option to outsource auditing process to other site of same corporation...

Post by: Serious Man, Oct 1, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
8.3 Design and development

If I've chosen path of objection every time I've heard "You are wrong!" I wouldn't know, what I know now. Beginnings were hard. I was not with...

Post by: Serious Man, Sep 28, 2018 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
Post
8.3 Design and development

Beware of people who say "appeal" easily.

Post by: Serious Man, Sep 28, 2018 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
Post
7.5.1.1 d - How to document customer-specific requirements in a matrix

I would like to clarify. I used word "unfortunately" not as sign, that I don't support this idea. IATF non-subscribers, Tier-1 deserve same...

Post by: Serious Man, Sep 28, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
What is difference between Review & Reverse PFMEA?

I am not an expert, but I see there two steps. First step is focused on verification on work station, that all planned failures prevention and...

Post by: Serious Man, Sep 19, 2018 in forum: FMEA - Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
Post
What is difference between Review & Reverse PFMEA?

There have to be a reason to review PFMEA. E.g. we review PFMEA in case of customer's claim, to confirm that concern reported by customer, was...

Post by: Serious Man, Sep 5, 2018 in forum: FMEA - Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
Post
7.1.5.1.1 MSA for built-in measurement systems

My response was focused on initial post and questioning reliability of oven built-in temperature control system. I've referred to first sentence...

Post by: Serious Man, Aug 29, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
7.5.1.1 d - How to document customer-specific requirements in a matrix

Unfortunately CSRs are not limited to OEM only and not always customer pointed outs directly standard clause in own supplier manual. Sometimes we...

Post by: Serious Man, Aug 28, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
7.1.5.1.1 MSA for built-in measurement systems

Shortly. Performing MSA for every control system mentioned in control plan is required. Using methods described by AIAG MSA book for every control...

Post by: Serious Man, Aug 28, 2018 in forum: IATF 16949:2016 - Automotive Quality Systems
Post
Management Review acc. to ISO9001:2015 - example

We are in ACT stage, where all CHECK activities were performed and results are available. Now it has to be decided what is direction of next PLAN...

Post by: Serious Man, Aug 24, 2018 in forum: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems

Showing results 1 to 20 of 76 Next >

Search Again

Page 1 of 4

Search Results

Useful Searches