For a technical report perhaps tabulated or placed upon a cross-sectional diagram?
So it's been reduced to simple first party assurance? Well I never. Lucky we're all so honest...
You could argue a first party audit on their own work (not desirable in this case) but do you not have a spread of trained internal auditors from...
Well that's just not systematic! lol
+1 Just define what's covered in the scope. When the time comes, expand that scope.
I would certainly think so - it may even be a requirement for new standards by now. Should make life a little simpler:)
Given the new version is being written to follow the new version of 9001 then don't anticipate huge material change (but you never know!). They'll...
That's great, thank you
Absolutely no need to do so. It's a draft which suggests you may identify and plan for certain gaps that may not exist when the new release comes...
Yikes. Thanks for the heads up as I had no idea this was coming!
Definitely worth spending the time to go on a residential course for a week or so. You learn not just the basics and theory but get the chance to...
Biggest challenge - realigning what people 'know' is quality and what the actuality is. Oh how we chuckle...
Ah good, this is what I need - a bit of questioning! There's a good basis for the argument to recheck and re-validate ANY change to this part. It...
Plenty of four letter words used lol It's having to take that back to basics and teach everyone in the building what a quality approach is and the...
I'd just like to confirm the requirement to re validate a component we design and have manufactured. This is a fairly expensive process to go...
Hi Chaps and Chapettes, Good to see a decent quality forum thriving :) I've been involved in various quality and other related standard for 20+...
Separate names with a comma.