1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

NCR/CAPA/CAR/CRN

Discussion in 'ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems' started by jamescrockford, Mar 15, 2018.

  1. Golfman25

    Golfman25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2015
    Messages:
    821
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Thank god your auditor can't "consult." She's wrong, way wrong. Ignore her and move on. Good luck.
     
  2. tony s

    tony s Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    1,055
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Laguna Philippines
    On your next surveillance audit, tell your CB not to send this auditor.:mad:
     
  3. James D.

    James D. New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Hi Roxane and Graham I thank you for your quick reply and detailed view on the matter, your suggestions will surely help me greatly in addressing changes in the QMS in the days to come, I like the idea of minor and major instances an will see how to incorporate it into my form, and the additional category and sources and I will see probably for a month how it moves along in the system.

    Graham I'm glad to hear that from the owner of the ccompany you are working for as I share the same belief with him regarding the services I provide.

    Can I just say that implementing a QMS would be so much easier if everyone was on board with the idea of product and service improvement and not just the whole we need that certificate to look good

    Golfman and Tony, I just keep telling myself maybe she's new or maybe she just doesnt get the point of a QMS gial being efficient and effective, simple and straightforward, not just a whole bunch of forms for record keeping and making my emlpoyees lives miserable with redundant paperwork.
     
  4. RoxaneB

    RoxaneB Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Just keep in mind that "minor" and "major" are old-school terms that aren't really in use any more. They are easy words to say however but could refer to when a nonconformance is a "correction" (minor) or "corrective action" (major).

    The whole point, as you said, is to make something efficient and effective. I would also offer up that it must add value (taking from lean here). If all it does is make work and/or make an external auditor's life easier, then it's probably not the system for your organization.
     
  5. tony s

    tony s Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    1,055
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Laguna Philippines
    There are times I would like my CB auditors to read from this forum. ;)
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.
  6. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    2,560
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    I wouldn't bother! You will be digging a hole for yourself. Experience shows that, if the content of the report doesn't "sit well" with the management as a "major" or "minor", they will argue or diminish or refute the issue. Frankly, it's an external audit practice (only) and has no place in an internal situation.
     
    Graham Thorpe likes this.
  7. judegu

    judegu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2018
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    China
    Sir. In my company, we kind of categorize the quality issues (N/C, such as customer complaint, internal quality accident) using the "large", "medium", "small" scale. I think it is quite similar to the "MA", "MI" thing. However we do this kind of category based on the quality cost of each case. I think it is quite useful to focus on the main player on the ground. What is your opinion about it?
     
  8. judegu

    judegu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2018
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    China
    Hi RoxaneB. I am a little confused now. MA and MI are still in use, right? BTW correction for MI and corrective action for MA is surely a good way to see the difference between this two.:)
     
  9. tony s

    tony s Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    1,055
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Laguna Philippines
    Yes for CB auditors. It is included as one of the terminologies in ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems). For internal audit, it is not mandatory. However, you can consider the guidelines specified in ISO 19011:2018 Section 6.4.8 which says that: "Nonconformities can be graded depending on the context of the organization and its risks. This grading can be quantitative (e.g. 1 to 5) and qualitative (e.g. minor, major)."
     
    judegu likes this.
  10. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    2,560
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    I already posted that opinion.
     
  11. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    2,560
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Sounds like whomever wrote that hasn't actually done it...
     
    ncwalker likes this.