1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
You must be a registered member in order to post messages and view/download attached files in this forum.
Click here to register.

Distributor vs Manufacturer C of C

Discussion in 'Documentation Control, Procedures, Templates,...' started by redpill, Nov 21, 2015.

  1. redpill

    redpill New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Hello,

    I have a debate with a few colleagues regarding whether a distributor can issue a Certificate of Conformance on a part that they buy from a manufacturer.

    There is no manufacturer C of C with the part, but the distributor issued a C of C for that part.

    Can a distributor issue a C of C on a part they do not manufacture ? In my opinion, only the manufacturer can certify the part.

    Thanks !
     
  2. Somashekar

    Somashekar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    27
    It depends on what is confirmed in the C of C.
    A distributor can confirm that the part (proper identification) he has supplied has been manufactured by xyz (Your approved manufacturer) and that he is the authorized distributor of xyz in his C of C.
     
  3. redpill

    redpill New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Somashekar, thank you for your reply.

    The C of C statement is the usual, saying something to the effect that the parts conform to requirements, etc. It is basically a C of C that 'certifies' the parts.

    Had the C of C stated that it confirms that the parts were purchased from the XYZ manufacturer, I would have no issue (even though the parts are still not traceable to the manufacturer, but that is a different story).
     
  4. Andy Nichols

    Andy Nichols Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    2,560
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    In the "Rust Belt"
    Unless you know what's behind the Certificate, it's not worth much, really. Unless they are providing data in support of some tangible characteristics, then just saying "it is what we said it is" isn't much use, is it?
     
  5. redpill

    redpill New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Andy Nichols, my thoughts exactly ....

    Thank you.
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.
  6. Somashekar

    Somashekar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    27
    How and what you want in the C of C must be established at the stage when the evaluation and selection of the supplier is being done.
     
  7. Candi1024

    Candi1024 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    27
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    If the distributer was able to actually verify that the part meets requirments, then I don't see why not.

    If you want the manufacturer listed, I would either request a modified C of C, or request a copy of the purchase order and manufacturer specs.
     
  8. James

    James Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    We try to communicate our requirement in the PO information we flow down to the customer. With counterfeit prevention plan requirements this kind of information traceability is more and more important for customer confidence. I've often seen the requirement be specific that it come from the source. Supply chain traceability gets more "particular" with government work tho, so maybe you don't have that concern.
     
    Candi1024 likes this.
  9. Eric Twiname

    Eric Twiname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    42
    Location:
    Northeast USA
    FWIW, a Certificate of COMPLIANCE or a Certificate of CONFORMANCE mandates something to comply with or conform to...

    I get asked for C of C often in my distributorship...and send CoA from the manufacturer instead.
    With no mutually agreed spec, how can I certify that I comply with it?
    And without my own testing, why should I assume the liability for the manufacturer?

    Whether or not C of C is required in the PO or not...it is typically an oxymoron for a distributor...like overnight shipping for a two week lead time item.
     
  10. James

    James Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    My post should have said, "...we flow down to the supplier." not customer. Oops! Not seeing an edit button. Most traceability we need for our customers requires something from the original manufacturer, so for our needs we just get it from the source.
     
  11. Miner

    Miner Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Location:
    Greater Milwaukee USA
    I agree that a C of C isn't worth much. I have seen instances where the same lot number had been used for years, and where even though the lot number changed the results were constant from lot to lot. If you rely on C of Cs, I would send samples out for independent verification on a periodic basis, and let your supplier know that in advance. It tends to promote honesty.
     
    Andy Nichols likes this.
  12. Nikki

    Nikki Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    42
    Location:
    Maine
    When we distribute material that we do not produce, we supply the customer with the actual manufacturer's COA... We feel that if we were to certify that material - then we would be held liable if something was wrong with it. Just playing it safe.